UDQuickly Home My Old House Snapshots UD Magazine
Send a Class Notes
Ask a Marianist

@DayMag

  • @mfgmikem Thanks, Mike. I was hoping (expecting) you'd know. 1 day ago
  • @mfgmikem Thanks. How about a treadmill? Or a light in the gym? 1 day ago
  • @udandi Ah, yes, but it's the weekend, and the twitterverse never sleeps. (Plus, there are a lot of smart Flyers out there.) 1 day ago
Hidden Treasure

Read our interactive issue to see videos, links and more.

UD Magazine apps
Naomi Cahn

Marriage — the new marker of social class?

3:36 PM  Feb 13th, 2012
by Shannon Shelton Miller

In 1970, there wasn’t much difference in the likelihood of marriage for men and women based on their level of education. By 2011, although marriage rates had dropped nationwide, they declined the least among the college-educated.

Those were among the statistics Naomi R. Cahn, a law professor at George Washington University, shared as she discussed the effect of socioeconomic class on marriage and family formation during a Feb. 9 talk sponsored by the School of Law and the women’s and gender studies program.

Her lecture “Family Classes: What Really Happened to the American Family?” examined how middle class women are approaching marriage and family formation differently from their counterparts in the working class, as increased income and career opportunities resulting from higher education has made women more selective. Although college-educated women marry later, they’re less likely to divorce.

They’re also likely to marry a man of a similar socioeconomic and educational background.

“Women are becoming choosier about whom they’re willing to marry,” she said.

That’s a strategy, however, that doesn’t translate well to those in the working class, Cahn said. There, higher percentages of men are written off as unmarriageable because of factors such as unemployment, substance abuse, mental illness and imprisonment, leading to decreased marriage rates and higher nonmarital birth rates.

It’s problematic, Cahn said, when marriage and its benefits become limited to the upper classes. She said addressing economic inequality should be among the solutions explored for working class men and women.

“Marriage should not be a marker of class,” Cahn said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • ud grounds worker uses leaf blower by Larry Burgess
  • 060606hare
  • women's soccer practice on stuart field in fall by Larry Burgess
  • University of Dayton sign
  • tailgate dinner
  • library study feature in silhouette by Larry Burgess
  • 032111supermoon
  • dog on porch by Larry Burgess
  • 071509bluesky
  • 20120730-UDPR-EJK-6403-UDQ
  • 040111spring
  • Clemson defeated UAB 70-52 in the NCAA First Four held at UD Arena. by Christine Bates ’11
  • angel crosswalk sign by Larry Burgess
  • Calm before the warm
  • football players
  • student artwork
  • reflection of Rike Center
  • Flyer Fun Run by Molly Majetic